Tuesday 18 November 2014

Indian sterilisation patient: ‘I was slapped and told to calm down’

Woman recounts treatment at camp where 15 women have died after taking antibiotics possibly tainted by rat poison chemical
Shivkumari Yadav sits with daughters Prisha, two months, Mansi, three, and her mother Mahasin Bai
Shiv Kumari Yadav (right) sits with daughters Prisha, two months, and Mansi, three, as her mother Mahasin Bai looks on. Photograph: Alok Putul for the Guardian
A woman who became seriously ill at the Indian sterilisation camps that have killed 15 women has spoken of being slapped by a doctor and told to “calm down” after screaming in pain at the procedure.
Shiv Kumari Yadav, 27, attended one of the clinics in Chhattisgarh, eastern India, at which antibiotics were handed out that authorites have said might have contained rat poison. She said she had stomach cramps and vomited after taking antibiotic pills following the operation.
Yadav is a tall, slight mother-of-three, her hands and feet roughened from hauling bricks all day. Her two-month-old daughter, Prisha, sat in her lap as she spoke about the camp, which has ignited debate in India about the country’s population control policies and healthcare system.
Yadav’s story appears to implicate the pills for the illnesses and possibly the deaths. Officials say samples have been sent to laboratories in Delhi and Kolkata for further testing.
Yadav said she went voluntarily to the sterilisation camp on 8 November. “We decided after my youngest was born that we did not want any more children,” she said from her bed in the large ward at the government-run Chattisgarh Institute of Medical Science (CIMS), where many of those who fell sick have been admitted.
During the surgery, Yadav said, she was awake and at one point screamed because of the pain. But the doctor slapped her lightly and said: “Calm down – it’s almost over.”
Ten minutes later, after she had been stitched up, Yadav said she and her husband paid for an auto-rickshaw home, an extravagance for a couple who earn $4 between them on days when they can find work hauling sand, concrete or bricks at construction sites in Bilaspur town.
“We were given $10 for having the operation,” she said. “We spent $8 to hire the autorickshaw.”
Hours later, back home in their village of Ghutgu, 16km away, Shiv Kumari said she swallowed two of the white, oblong Ciprocin pills that had been prescribed.
“First I got terrible stomach cramps,” she said. “Then I began vomiting. I went to our local government clinic and the nurse gave me medicine to stop the vomiting, but the next day it started again, and then I fainted.”
Yadav was initially taken to a private hospital where doctors said her condition was too serious. She ended up at CIMS, along with other women who had attended the camp.
One woman from her own village, who arrived a day after Yadav, died.
“We’re lucky that we live close to town,” said Mahasin Bhai, Yadav’s mother. “If the hospital had been any further away, there would have been a carpet of corpses.”
State officials said on Saturday that tablets were found to contain a chemical compound commonly used in rat poison. Preliminary tests of Ciprocin were found to contain zinc phosphide, said Siddhartha Pardeshi, the chief administrator for Bilaspur district.
However on Sunday the company involved denied any wrongdoing, claiming all that had been found was a sticky pad used to catch rats in a storeroom and this had snowballed into “exaggerated” reports that the pills contained rat poison.
The antibiotics were handed out at the sterilisation camp. Three other patients, not involved in the camps but who reportedly took the same pills, have also died.
The deaths have fuelled criticism in India about its population control and family planning policies – from the unofficial targets set to sterilise women, to the appalling conditions in camps and the lack of contraceptive choices for women.
The discovery of potentially tainted antibiotics highlights yet another problem, that of India’s largely unregulated pharmaceutical sector.
Activists and patients have described an assembly-line operation at last week’s camp, where nurses filled in women’s names on consent forms and did blood and urine tests without sharing the results.
“The women we spoke to said they were placed four to five on a bed and given five injections, two in each arm and one in the abdomen,” said Kerry McBroom, of the Human Rights Law Network, a Delhi-based collective of lawyers and activists. “They were taken into the operating theatre and after the procedure they were put in other beds or on the floor and stitched up.”
McBroom, who was in Chattisgarh to document women’s stories as part of ongoing litigation challenging the government-run camps, said none of the women nor the health workers she spoke to knew anything about the tubectomy procedure being performed. Only three of 15 women had heard of any other form of contraception.
McBroom said her interviews revealed potentially disturbing issues surrounding sterilisation targets, although none of the women said they had been physically forced to attend.
“In early November, there was a meeting held for all field-level health workers and a very senior person, though we don’t know who, told them they had to bring in at least three patients each because it would be good for this person’s career.”
State and national inquiries have been ordered, along with postmortem reports for the victims. Four health workers including the doctor RK Gupta, who performed 83 tubectomies in a matter of hours, have been arrested.
Yadav was critical of the way the camp was conducted in such haste.
“If they had told us we were weak and maybe the surgery wouldn’t suit us, I would have hesitated.”
Yadav said she had taken birth control pills for a year after her second pregnancy, but had heard from villagers that they might not be good for her.
“What can we do? This was the only way to stop more children from coming.”
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/15/indian-sterilisation-camp-victim-antibiotics-rat-poison

http://www.womensweb.in/2014/11/rejection-in-arranged-marriages/

What Happened After I Got Rejected In The Arranged Marriage Market

  •    
  •  
  •  
TAGS:POSTED: NOVEMBER 17, 2014
Being rejected in the arranged marriage market is not the end of the world. Here’s an account of living alone, living strong.
Several times, I hear people discussing why girls like me find it difficult to get married. A girl like me – who is twenty-eight, living in a city all by herself, and running her own little business. I have cried at times, (yes, I accept it here) after I went through rejections. After I heard lots of nasty comments directed at me by my so-called relatives, I too broke down. I too did not have the courage to look up and see the mirror. Perhaps I convinced myself that a girl like me is not good enough.
But after six months, I am writing this. I write this now to tell everybody that a girl like me can bounce back and face the world. This is the one life I have got, and I am going to live it. I am not going to hide, nor am I going to escape. I am going to face each one, and would request them to speak to me directly  instead of troubling my parents with the rude and sarcastic comments – that having a feminist daughter who is single at twenty-eight is a curse.
Let me say this to all the well-wishers: being independent, strong-headed, and smart does not mean that I am Anti-Men. It just implies that I too deserve equal opportunity and treatment like men. Simple! Is that a lot?

An abundance of nasty remarks

Why the taunt – wish you were a son? Would we then have been spared the unending insults from society? How many times I was reminded that my dream of getting a Master’s degree is useless, since the fee money for that could be used as dowry! How many times I have been reminded that even if the boy is of my choice, the wedding arrangements and every cost that would be incurred by the bride’s side is not to be equally split between two families!
I still am an unmarried girl with dreams and sky-high hopes. I still convince myself that I will manage. I still smile and start my day. I still go around and work. I still refuse to enter the arranged marriage market. I still laugh when my mother desperately calls only those people who have mentioned “no dowry” on their marriage advertisements.
I still am an unmarried girl with dreams and sky-high hopes. I still convince myself that I will manage.
No, I am not against marriage. I would love to get married, have two babies, and cook exotic dinners for my husband. But I would rather marry the man who could be my partner, who could be the one who does not demand respect but commands respect. I still enjoy karwachauth and teej and all the rituals; not because I am superstitious, but it is just another opportunity for me to rush to the nearest Salon and get a manicure done. Sounds greedy, but then that is how girls like me are. We want more from life and refuse to settle for anything less. So, is this a crime?

Wishing for change

Craving for a perfect life with an imperfect set of relationships is fun at times. Every moment is worth it. I do feel sad that nothing seems to change. Social stigma around unwed girls approaching thirty still remains. Dowry is still practised despite several strict laws and fair is still considered lovely. This is the country I was born in, but then c’est la vie (such is life)! I try to fit in. I remind myself of Steve Jobs’ very famous lines and smile. Perhaps he  (unknowingly) referred to girls like us:
“Here’s to the crazy ones, the misfits, the rebels, the troublemakers, the round pegs in the square holes… the ones who see things differently — they’re not fond of rules… You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them, but the only thing you can’t do is ignore them because they change things… they push the human race forward, and while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius, because the ones who are crazy enough to think that they can change the world, are the ones who do.”
Pic credit: Image of confident woman used for representational purposes only, via Shutterstock.
 http://www.womensweb.in/2014/11/rejection-in-arranged-marriages/

Monday 10 November 2014

Pregnancy tests conducted even on unmarried boxers

Eight women boxers, including unmarried and juniors, who are set to compete at the World Championships in Korea next week, have been subjected to pregnancy tests by Boxing India (BI), according to SAI consultant Dr. PSM Chandran.
Dr. Chandran, who is president of Indian Federation of Sports Medicine, said the tests were conducted by Sports Authority of India (SAI) at the behest of BI.
“These boxers have been compelled to undergo pregnancy tests. They ordered and the SAI followed suit. Pregnancy tests were carried out on eight young unmarried girls, some even juniors, a classic case of human rights violation,” Chandran claimed in a press release.
“The shocking thing is that it was done against rules. In the AIBA Technical Rules 2.1.4.2 which came into effect on 31 Aug 2014, there is no provision to subject boxers to pregnancy tests. The rule states “Women Boxers must additionally submit a non-pregnancy declaration along with the Medical Certificate. For Women Boxers under the age of 18, this non-pregnancy declaration must be signed by at least one of their parents or legal guidance,” Chandran explained.
“The hapless girls in their eagerness to don India colours had no choice but to concede to such barbaric demands by the officialdom against their own dignity and honour.”
However, BI Secretary Jay Kowli said he was not aware of the matter.
Chandran demanded that it was time for the National Human Rights Commission as well as the National Women Commission “to intervene in sports in order to ensure that the rights and dignity of girls who come forward to participate in sports are safe-guarded”.http://www.thehindu.com/sport/other-sports/world-boxing-championships-pregnancy-tests-conducted-even-on-unmarried-boxers/article6567852.ece

Is surrogacy a legitimate way out of poverty?

Doctors Nayna Patel and Mohan Rao go head to head.
Newborn babies [Related Image]
Moneymakers: commercial surrogacy is big business across the world. © ZUMA Press, Inc./Alamy
Every month we invite two experts to debate, and then invite you to join the conversation online.

Nayna

Reproductive infertility has always put unwanted pressure on couples, causing them much anxiety. The poor also have a dream to live a happy life without the burden of poverty.
Becoming a surrogate empowers women with a sense of worth and authority. Surrogates could actually help liberate women. Domestic labour should be paid, so when reproduction and pregnancy becomes a job, we will look at the value of female labour in a new light.
YES: Nayna Patel is the medical director at Akanksha IVF Clinic, Anand, Gujarat, India. More than 825 surrogate babies have been born at her clinic. Her work has been featured on the Oprah Winfrey Show and on the BBC. She runs the Anand Surrogate Trust for the benefit of the surrogates and their families.
This would elevate women’s status in a patriarchal capitalist society. They have the right to fulfil their dreams – not by doing anything wrong or immoral – but by giving the greatest gift, which is creating a family.
Only a hungry person understands the value of a piece of bread. How helpless does a woman feel when she wants to feed her children and can do nothing about it? Is it illegitimate to buy a house, educate children, start a small business and live a happy life by being a surrogate and helping an infertile couple?
Are we justified in refusing to enrol a surrogate, leaving her to live a life of struggle, pulling out the rug from under her? No, because the surrogate gets the blessings of the couple and financial support; the couple gets the baby – a win-win situation for all. Surrogacy allows a woman to help another woman.
In order to perpetuate survival on this planet, nature has given us two most powerful instincts, the instinct of self-preservation and the instinct of reproduction. So, if a woman wants to get rid of her poverty by doing the noblest deed, I firmly reiterate, surrogacy is a legitimate way of doing it.

Mohan

Let me make it very clear that I am talking about commercial surrogacy. The idea of ‘gifting’ life to a childless couple elides the fact that this is a global industry, said to be worth $3 billion in the US alone.
An estimate by a business newspaper suggests that as an integral part of the growing medical tourism industry, the fertility industry is said to have brought in additional revenue of $1–2 billion to India in 2012.
NO: Mohan Rao is a medical doctor, specializing in public health. He is a professor at the Centre of Social Medicine and Community Health, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India. His published works include From Population Control to Reproductive Health: Malthusian Arithmetic and, as editor, The Unheard Scream: Reproductive Health and Women’s Lives in India.
According to another estimate by a senior official in the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), the figures are even higher.
What we need to talk about is imperial bio-politics: capital, labour and entrenched inequalities that are at the heart of this global industry.
It is therefore disingenuous to talk about commercial surrogacy at the level of the individual surrogate. She is the last link in a chain of actors, all of whom are making large amounts of money from her reproductive labour.
Involved in this network are promoters, third-party administrators, travel agents, the hospitality industry, surrogate hostel admin­istrators and, of course, the doctors. Frequently, NGOs are used to source surrogates.
It is risible to talk about how this ‘empowers’ the surrogate. Most empirical research on surrogates shows us that they see themselves as reproductive slaves. They are stigmatized, and many of them are unable to return to their former homes, although they tell themselves they are not prostitutes.

Nayna

Any arrangement or procedure – be it medical or otherwise – has a chain of people earning from it. So why sideline surrogacy?
Becoming a surrogate empowers women with a sense of worth and authority. Surrogates could actually help liberate women – Nayna
The fact remains that there are couples who cannot have babies without surrogacy (even when they have tried adoption) and there are women who want to have a better life for themselves and their families. If by doing this noble deed, a woman can achieve that, who are we to judge?
As for the surrogates, you cannot go by the studies but have to meet them personally and share their experiences. I can quote innumerable surrogates whose lives have been changed by this.
Most of our surrogates have been able to use the money to support their children into higher education, buy a house for their family, start a small business, and pay off debts. They never see themselves as reproductive slaves!
It is society which looks upon them in that way. ‘Reproductive Slaves’ – please, before saying this, at least spend a day in their lives and experience what they are going through.
They never think of themselves as prostitutes. They are seen as ‘prostitutes’ by society and so-called ‘well wishers’, who use such terms. Their families support them. They are welcome back home. The surrogates are empowered.

Mohan

You attempt to obfuscate issues. It is not necessary for any medical procedure to be paid for. It is in your world that money-chasing is disguised as ‘donation’ or ‘gift’ or ‘altruism’ in order to mask a deeply exploitative practice. No-one here is talking of altruistic surrogacy, but commercial surrogacy.
The fact remains that commercial surrogacy is taking place largely in poor countries, with a large population of poor women, willing to be exploited within a system of entrenched structural coercion.
The idea of ‘gifting’ life to a childless couple elides the fact that this is a global industry, said to be worth $3 billion in the US. – Mohan
This is a facet of neoliberal global dystopia, which makes money out of the bodies of poor people, sometimes in clinical trials, sometimes in surrogacy. It is by recognizing this aspect of the global bio-economy that governments have stepped in to ban trade in body parts, such as kidneys.
Doctors who prescribe surrogacy strengthen patriarchy. What it represents is the genetic worship of the ‘male line which has to be carried on’. Instead of questioning and undermining the heterosexual normative family, what surrogacy does is entrench it.
Black feminists [in the US] – the experiences of slavery and the exploitation of their repro­duction still vivid in their histories – have challenged the discourse of ‘choice’ and ‘empowerment’ in their quest for reproductive justice. They understand what reproductive slavery is.
It is true that a state’s failure to provide for education and health often forces women with few options to take recourse to surrogacy, but that should not justify it.

Nayna

With all due respect, the greatest number of surrogacies are happening in the US, one of the richest countries in the world – the so-called superpower – and with couples coming from Europe, Britain and Japan. Nobody says that’s exploitation.
Also, surrogacy is not a one-day procedure which a woman can be forced into. Surrogacy can only take place if a woman does it voluntarily.
What is exploitation? A woman becoming a surrogate and from that money buying a house, educating her children, helping her husband start a small business? Or allowing a woman to stay poor, letting the husband commit suicide and her children give up their studies due to financial crisis?
If a state fails, should the woman also fail and never empower herself?
Surrogacy gives the surrogate her due respect in her family, makes her a more confident female and empowered woman – this in itself is less patriarchal. There is no question of male line! You need to be in this age and understand the process of surrogacy. It is ridiculous to compare it to reproductive slavery.
There is no organ removed, like kidney transplants – so there is no comparison there, either. You could compare it with donating blood. A woman can be a surrogate not just once, but up to three times (according to Indian Council of Medical Research guidelines).
Even in Indian mythology and the Bible – there is mention of surrogacy.
So rather than be critical, understand and accept this procedure as a legitimate way out of poverty and salute these surrogates!

Mohan

You deliberately, and misleadingly, place the responsibility of poverty on the individual. There are a billion people going hungry in the world. Is surrogacy the answer?
Are you not aware that self-directed violence is frequently a response to structural violence? Far from empowering a woman, it represents loss of choice, loss of autonomy, loss of control. It is an expression of lack of opportunities; not of ‘empowerment’.
There are so many cases of women in India being forced into surrogacy by their families. There are also reports of women being trafficked for surrogacy. This therefore feeds into and feeds off the rampant misogyny in India.
Again, you deliberately, and repeatedly, confound altruistic and commercial surrogacy. There was no global reproductive labour industry at the time of the Bible, exploiting women’s bodies, mining them.
Do you support the surrogate creation of a saviour baby? What are the long-term health impacts of surrogacy?
Also, we must question how ‘voluntary’ is the decision of the surrogate to enter into an exploitative relationship. Libertarian feminists valorize choice, seduced by the idea of a contract. How free is the labour contract? Surrogacy is a tribute to the un-free character of wage labour.
That surrogacy happens in the world’s richest nation is not surprising. Capitalism, patriarchy and race come together there in worship of the dollar.
‘Not an angel, not a whore’ is the plaintive cry of the surrogate. What she is, is a woman whose reproductive labour is exploited at the altar of patriarchy.
- See more at: http://newint.org/sections/argument/2014/11/01/argument-surrogacy-poverty/#sthash.xqeuFwdv.dpuf

Delhi High Court judgement on rape and murder of 65-year-old sparks off debate

uesday, 4 November 2014 - 7:45am IST Updated: TuesdaCan forceful sex with a 65-year-old woman, who is beyond the age of menopause, punishable under law? Delhi High Court judges seem to think otherwise. A judgment made on Friday by the Delhi High court in the case of rapeand murder of an old woman in December, 2010 has sparked a debate on whether sexual intercourse with a post-menopausal woman can be treated as rape. 
The judgement, made by a bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Mukta Gupta has let off the accused, 49-year-old Achey Lal, waiving off the punishment meted out to the accused on the grounds that even if the intercourse “has been forceful, it was not forcible”.
“As regards the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC the deceased was aged around 65-70 years, thus beyond the age of menopause. We find force in the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that even if the sexual intercourse was forceful it was not forcible and contrary to the wishes and consent of the deceased,” read the judgement.  
In December 2010, the victim was found dead inside her house in Majnu ka Tila along with an inebriated Achey Lal by a girl at whose house the victim worked. Achey Lal was arrested and eventually sentenced to 10 years of rigourous imprisonment. The post-mortem of the victim revealed that she has sustained injuries on her vagina, and traces of alcohol were found on her, too. 
Lawyer-activist Vrinda Grover questioned the use of the word ‘menopause’. “On what grounds did the court has arrive on the judgement that the case was not one of rape? And where does menopause factor in here? Menopause is a medical condition, and the mention of the word is extraneous and erroneous. The injuries on the victim’s vagina proves that there was forced penetration, and the inference will lead to the criminal case of rape. Also, the judgement says that there are no other injuries, which is clearly a step back to the pre-Mathura era, where one would look for injurious to prove rape. The Mathura rape case led to two amendments; one, there should not be any requirement about explaining injuries for rape. And secondly, consent should be univocal. This case, to my mind, without the privilege of any evidence to be able to construct the case and thus rely on the judgement, is erroneous and not according to the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court,” said Grover. 
Jugmati Sangwan of the All India Democratic Women’s Association said that the age of the woman should have, in fact, led to a bigger punishment. “Age does not matter in rape; 80-year-olds get raped, too. If the culprit is revengeful and bent on causing maximum harm, the age is a deterrent than. Should the age alone not be considered for any ground? This should lead to more punishment,” said Sangwan. 
Lawyer Collin Gonsalves, however, said that the court could have been right, but the mention of the word ‘menopause’ is unfortunate. “It is a very cryptic judgement, and the reference to the word ‘menopause’ is unfortunate, unnecessary and irrelevant. The injuries on the vagina, however, indicates rape. Despite that, the court could be correct as injuries alone cannot lead a criminal court to conclude that it can be rape. There must be more evidence, because this could also have been a case of rough intercourse; forceful yet consensual sex,” said Gonsalves. y, 4 November 2014 - 1:15am IST | Place: New Delhi 

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-forceful-sex-on-menopausal-woman-not-rape-says-delhi-high-court-2031918

Thursday 6 November 2014

Kiss of love: Public kissing Western? Public pissing Indian? How do Hindus make love? Clearly, they don’t kiss as the kiss is really a Western product and against Hindu culture. Right?

Urvashi Butalia





How do Hindus make love? Clearly, they don’t kiss as the kiss is really a Western product and against Hindu culture. This could be the reason there are virtually no kissing scenes in Hindi cinema – because most of the actors (barring a few Khan type men) are Hindus, and they can’t be seen kissing publicly, so instead they make do with flowers leaning into each other and music in the background.
I’ve always found this very strange: I’m not sure if Hindu men – at least those who are protesting, particularly in Kochi, and the many who are not protesting but who silently support those who are – find kissing Western, or just kissing in public Western. Also, is it kissing on the lips only that’s objectionable, or the cheeks, the forehead, the chin, shoulder or… (those three dots are for other body parts that cannot be named).
I’m mystified though. Why is it that kissing in public is objectionable and pissing in public is not? Is it because it’s an Indian thing for men to pull their genitals out in full public view and let flow? There’s no doubt it’s a very Indian thing, I don’t know of other cultures who have this habit, so perhaps the cultural appropriateness makes it all right.
But pissing doesn’t have the same problem as kissing – for men at least. You can only piss from one spot and all you can do is to aim further or closer. Kissing though is another story: mothers sometimes kiss their babies on the lips, and in public too. How shocking and Western is that? Fathers sometimes kiss their daughters on the forehead, especially when they are blessing them, and this happens in front of in-laws, husbands, the general public, at weddings, engagement parties. And this too must be Western.
In fact, if we think logically, kissing is an expression of love and the West can’t lay exclusive claim to love. Proof of this can be found in our holy books and epics where people are constantly falling in and out of love. Further – and more modern – proof can be found in our dictionaries and lexicons and our languages where there are many, many words for love.
Kissing too has some words of its own, and even some songs. Perhaps we should ban those too? The Big B will no longer be able to demand, chuma-chuma de de, nor will our heroes (especially the Khans) pucker up their lips and ask for "pappi, pappi".
But words or no words, kissing is still not kosher.Especially lip to lip. Even Kangana Ranaut was shocked at the prospect in Queen and like a good Indian girl, she turned her back to the camera to do it, and good girl that she is, she did it only once. That’s one thing pissing and kissing may have in common: people usually turn their backs to do it.
Actually, I think it’s a good idea to focus on Indian (Hindu) tradition. After all, we have many good things there that we have forgotten about. One of them is called the swayamvar – swayam, ie yourself, var, ie husband, in other words, choose your own husband, or, in today’s context, choose your own partner (this can allow a certain amount of gender flexibility). What if we were to bring this forgotten but time-honoured tradition back, and all women chose their own partners? Who would give a damn then about where and when the kisses will happen?

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of DailyO.in or the India Today Group. The writers are solely responsible for any claims arising out of the contents of this article.http://www.dailyo.in/life/kiss-of-love-public-kissing-western-public-pissing-indian/story/1/566.html
URVASHI BUTALIA

Shweta Basu Prasad on Prostitution Scandal: Chose to Fly and Rise Above Written By: Chandni Prashar | November 06, 2014

THE VOICES MURMURED, 'END THE JOURNEY.'/'JUMP! JUMP YOU UGLY THING.'/I SMILED TO THEM AND PITIED THEM,/THEY DON'T KNOW I HAVE WINGS, READS A PASSAGE IN SHWETA'S POEM

Actress Shweta Basu Prasad, who became the pivot of a prostitution scandal recently, has said in an interview that 'bad luck' led to her being arrested from a Hyderabad hotel and that events didn't happen quite the way they were made out to be in media reports.

The actress, who is back in Mumbai after spending two months at a rehabilitation centre in Hyderabad, told Mumbai Mirror that she didn't turn to the sex trade to support her family. "I have had a simple upbringing but have never lacked for anything," she said.

She also denies ever hiring an agent named Balu, who was also arrested that night for accepting cash allegedly on her behalf, and says she only spoke to him because he told her he wanted her to attend some events. "We actresses do these events - award functions, ribbon cutting etc," she says. "For instance, I had gone to Hyderabad to attend an awards function, the Santosham Awards, and the organisers had paid for my air fare and hotel stay. It was my bad luck that I decided to stay on an extra day to meet my friends which is when the raid happened."

While the 23-year-old National Award-winner refused to talk about what happened in the hotel that night, she did tell Mumbai Mirror, "I don't understand how I got into such a big mess. I was not doing drugs, I was not murdering someone... people are so interested (only) because they think here's some sex, some suffering and someone with a name (sic)."

She also spoke about her experiences at the remand home and admitted to being caught in a "fog of despair."

"I decided to teach the children of the remand home - there's a school within its compound - Hindi, English and music. I told myself 'Shweta is dead, she has disappeared into this character of a school teacher that she is portraying.

Just portray the character and make it a good performance'."

Mumbai Mirror also reproduced a poem Shweta wrote while in the remand home, with this accompanying clarification from Shweta: "It should not seem as if I was suicidal or something. I chose to fly and rise above it all, you know."

Shweta's poem:

"Thunderstruck, all alone, I stand here at the edge of the cliff./I crawled the dense forest to get here/The tribes and wild and strays/ They say 'Jump, jump from the cliff.'/As I look down, naked, cold and trembling,/The ferocious sea I see with its mouth open/It's ready to swallow me./ The noises are unbearable/the place so dark. /As I decided to jump in the sea I saw the North Star./I remembered how it shone above my blessed home/where singing hugging and laughter awaited me/I said, 'Wait I want to go home.'/The voices murmured, 'End the journey.'/'Jump! Jump you ugly thing.'/I smiled to them and pitied them,/They don't know I have wings.

Shweta Basu Prasad, who won a National Award for her role as a child star in 2002 film Makdee, was arrested in a Hyderabad hotel last month, with the organizer of the alleged prostitution racket. She was quoted then as saying that bankruptcy had forced her into the sex trade. Many film insiders had publicly spoken out in her support, including actress Deepika Padukone and TV star Sakshi tanwar who played Shweta's mother on the hit soap Kahani Ghar Ghar Kii.
 http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/shweta-basu-prasad-on-prostitution-scandal-chose-to-fly-and-rise-above-689424

Here's how Salman Khan and Parineeti Chopra turned the issue of women's safety into running gag on Bigg Boss 8

Thursday, 6 November 2014One step forward but 10 steps back — that's Indian television for you. And the latest show to join the bandwagon (unsurprisingly, in many ways) is reality show 'Bigg Boss season 8'. The incident occurred when contestant Ali Quli Mirzaallegedly touched Sonali Raut inappropriately before being told off by her, and others joining in protest resulting in his nomination for eviction. 
The debate around a woman's right to her body has been an ongoing one, but Bigg Bossseason 8 brings the hypocrisy to the forefront. The issue was pretty clear: when contestant Upen Patel was seen cosying up with Sonali Raut under a blanket, Ali Quli Mirza decided to join in and put his hand under the blanket too. Sonali Raut protested against this and rightly so. The issue of 'consent' was completely thrown out of the window which the feminists have been fighting for and Sonali managed to bring the issue of alleged misconduct to the forefront.
What the creative team of Bigg Boss season 8 did was sickeningly alarming and the team of Kill Dil joining the prank just demeaned the way the team had set an example just a day before by standing up with Sonali Raut and admonishing Ali Quli Mirza for his alleged inappropriate behaviour.
Here's a two case scenario: 
First stance: If you judge Sonali for her alleged proximity to Upen Patel then you are completely wrong. It is her choice and personal decision to decide what she wants. It is basic human and women's rights to be able to decide what to wear, decide what to do without anyone's intervention and if someone is dictating otherwise, it is violation of rights.
But, as usual, patriarchy runs deep in India and Ali took advantage of the situation. The general notion that runs mostly in this country is that if she is okay being intimate with him then as patriarchial norms dictate, she must be a woman of bad character. Hence, I have the right to treat her the way I want to without caring for what her rights are. 
The second stance: A woman has the right to do what she wants with consent but a man cannot take advantage of the fact. NO means NO and just that. 
What happened on day one was heartening. While Ali laughed and followed this up with denial before finally being nominated for eviction. Even other housemates who did not support Raut earlier due to tiffs stood by her when the whole issue played out.
So, the reason for writing this piece is pretty clear — what little positive action Bigg Boss contestants took against Ali lost its steam when Parineeti Chopra entered the Bigg Boss house and played a prank that belittled action taken by Sonali Raut.
So much for movie promotions?
Parineeti Chopra, Ali Zafar and Ranveer Singh entered the house in a rickshaw to promote their upcoming film Kill Dil. The creative team decided to play a prank and use Parineeti's presence in the house to teach (maybe) Ali a lesson. The Kill Dil team decided to play a game with the contestants after which Parineeti told Ali off for touching her inappropriately.
This was followed by Parineeti storming out of the house rather angry and hurt andSalman Khan admonishing Ali for his behaviour. While all the inmates attacked Ali for this second attempt of alleged misconduct after his altercation with Sonali Raut, the whole Parineeti issue turned out to be a hoax. While Salman Khan laughed it off, Parineeti said that the incident was staged. So much for movie promotions? The biggest question arising now is: Where is the Parineeti who spoke about women rights, dignity and the right to consent. Not long ago, she had lashed out at a journalist for asking bad questions and showing women in bad light.
Watch the video below: 
That Parineeti who has chosen roles with careful scrutiny — be it Ishaqzaade where she played a feisty Zoya who followed her heart or Hasee toh Phasee and Shuddh Desi Romance. Well, all of that fizzled out with this incident when Parineeti agreed to be a part of the prank. 
Once bitten, twice shy is not the adage that may work for Ali. When our movies show a hero literally stalking his muse till she gives in and falls head-or-heels in love with him, a majority of Indians believe that to be love. So, when Ali was reprimanded once and nominated for evictions, that was a clear message that this sort of behaviour would not be acceptable within the house, thereby setting an example of sorts for the general masses in public who religiously follow the show. A much needed lesson that could set a trend and debated upon. But, with Parineeti's act, the whole impact has been diluted and we are back to square one.
Do the math: 
And here are the statistics. According to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), 93 women are raped in the country every day.The report further adds that there is a gradual increase in the number of rapes reported in India - from 24,923 in 2012 to 33,707 in 2013. And these crimes start out as eve-teasing, stereotypes being re-enforced etc. And take the debate centerstage if you wish to, but Bollywood and TV do impact the way people and their behaviour gets shaped on a daily basis. Hence, a show like Bigg Boss, a superstar like Salman Khan and a talented actress like Parineeti just made the biggest mockery possible. And no, the joke is not on public this time. It's on you for backtracking the developments and treating the issue like a mere joke.
http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-here-s-how-salman-khan-and-parineeti-chopra-turned-the-issue-of-women-s-safety-into-running-gag-on-bigg-boss-8-2032634