Monday, 29 September 2014

Wildly Wise MANASI MATHKAR

Betut Manurung. Photo courtesy: The Ramon Magsaysay Foundation

Butet Manurung, winner of the Ramon Magsaysay Award 2014, talks about her work with Indonesia’s indigenous tribes and why she chose to start a school in the jungle.

Saur Marlina Manurung, better known as Butet Manurung, is an embodiment of passion, grit, and determination. A 2014 Ramon Magsaysay Awardee for her incredible work to better the lives of Indonesia’s indigenous tribe, the Orang Rimba, her organisation SOKOLA strives to empower the remote nomadic tribes by teaching them basic literacy and relevant life skills. SOKOLA primarily works in the rainforests of Central Sumatra where an estimated 3,500 Orang Rimba live in relative isolation grappling with issues related to decreasing forest land.
As a child, Butet remembers being a diehard fan of Indiana Jones and being obsessed with indigenous people and their lives. Little did she know then that her passion would not only earn her international recognition but go on to uplift the lives of 10,000 children and adults. Here she shares her thoughts on Sokola Rimba, the ‘Jungle School’, and what it takes to attain success on such an unchartered territory. Excerpts:
Sustainable Development is a tricky realm where you need to strike a balance between needs of the modern world and preserving traditions. How do you help the indigenous people deal with the community-level emotional or philosophical conflict?
When I began working, it was also a personal debate about whether they really need a change? Will this be preserving or destroying their culture? As an anthropologist, I’m more of the destruction opinion. Culture is pivotal for a society. Yet I don’t want to see them in a romantic way. You ask people to preserve their culture but are you doing that yourself? So I ask them to think the same way — how do you think your traditions will survive in today’s world? It takes them a long time but also makes them think that if we continue preserving our culture without any compromise we will all be dead.
Indigenous people, ever since they are kids, are taught by their parents to be independent. It makes them so open about their weaknesses and also stubborn about what they have. But it also helps them define by themselves what is sustainable to them, what is the best development or the best future.
So you leave for them to decide?
Yes, I will not feel so selfish about what is considered good according to me. It’s not my future, it’s their future. It’s not about living someone else’s dream. But I have to make sure they know the risks involved. When the first time I came to the jungle they asked me, “Why was I born an Orang Rimba?” They felt ashamed to be an Orang Rimba, as if it’s a mistake. That was my first task to make them feel happy and proud of themselves before they learn about other expertise. Because once a community is not proud of itself you will never make it independent.
The only skill that they need to maintain, and which they only have, is to be critical. All indigenous people in the world are critical. Until the outside world comes and indoctrinates them — about the mainstream ideal world — and it’s so intoxicating, so poisonous. If you want to conserve them, just show them bad things about the cities. If you want to change them show them the good things — everything with remote controls, money coming out of ATMs. I just try to be open with them about what it means to be a city person, show them both the sides. And they then conclude that city life is so strange — a kitchen will have 200 plates but only four persons live in that house, you cannot just take things, and everything belongs to someone. They learn it by themselves that what they have in the jungle is so complete and everything makes sense there. I’m not surprised that none of my students come out of the jungle. They may even learn how to make a film but then they say “we have to document our traditions” and so they take that skill back to the jungle.
Can you share some of your teaching methods?
We have a special reading methodology in which we teach through sounds. It actually enables a kid to read in less than two weeks. More than academic knowledge, we focus on practical skills which will help the Orang Rimba deal with issues they face — forest-exploiting businesses which take away their land, government agencies which threaten their basic rights and livelihoods, etc. Since this community is of hunters and gatherers, our schedules are flexible and teachers move with the Orang Rimba wherever they go.
Otherwise I just follow their ideas in the rhythm of the school. For instance, if the kids want to toss a ball and ask questions I just follow it, I toss it back too. I try to see things the way they see it. The point is how you deliver and how you accept the knowledge, not the way you do it.
How do you motivate your volunteers?
We have 18 teachers and 30 volunteers with 14 schools in 10 provinces. In the beginning I was the only crazy person! But once I came in the newspapers many came to me and said they share the same dream. I tell them that you have to follow your dream. You don’t live twice. Of course, I believe in incarnation and if I live another life I hope I live it this way again. This is my dream job. So I give this confidence to the volunteers that this is your dream life; if not, please don’t do it. It’s kind of difficult to find a very committed volunteer, but many of them want to try and keep on doing for years together.
Was this journey any different being a woman?
The journey was difficult in the beginning because I was an outsider to the Orang Rimba. There were so many problems. For instance, they hate paper and pencil. They consider it as black magic because it can cheat illiterates. It took several months to just convince them to take up learning.
However, it’s easier to be a woman in the Orang Rimba because they value women more than men. Women decide everything. There is one good tradition — men have to sacrifice their life for a woman. If you walk in a jungle and see a woman threatened by a bear, the man has to put his life at stake to help this woman. Otherwise, he is not man enough and none of the girls will want to marry him. Men have to work harder. And young boys are taught that they have to control their desires — hunger/ anger/ sexual/ everything. Whereas women have to follow their desires since only a woman with aspirations will understand the needs of the children.
If we have to replicate the Sokola model elsewhere what are the key factors which need to be considered?
I think indigenous people face the same problems everywhere in the world — social, economic, environmental. Also, the governments or the outside world never validates their knowledge. Indigenous people are actually the best teachers on environment. You might come up with a theory but they know a lot better than anyone else. We need to teach these people, document their local knowledge, and share it with the outside world. Hence, we need to support them in every possible way so they have more power to decide and to look after the environment. Only 0.6 per cent of the world population is indigenous people but they live in 1/3 of the world’s arable land. So imagine how important their role is in preserving this 1/3 of the world even though they are just 300 million. Also, the very existence of these people is dependent on forest resources for their food, shelter, and livelihood.
Thus, education is an important aspect. The indigenous people can’t even speak the national language. We should teach them and help them mediate and exchange stories and knowledge. Jungle school is a good method to do so. And it’s easy to set up a school. Just come to the community, identify their problems, put it as a curriculum, and make the school that they want and help them become stronger.
Since there is very less of a structured teaching pattern followed what role does trust play in this success story?
A lot. Our ultimate goal is teaching skills of advocacy. We train them in advocacy and empower them to liaison between their community and the outside world. Today they have skills to maintain their rights. So they know how to seek help, how to network for a certain problem, whom to seek help for a specific problem, and also to organise themselves. Of course, they will not just listen to you on the first day you meet them. They will test you. But they have instincts. And hence, it all comes down to how much trust and faith you develop between one another.
www.thehindu.com/features/magazine/wildly-wise/article6429726.ece

Sunday, 28 September 2014

Caste and conservatism in our TV serials

Why do most of Indian serials feature basic types like Banias, Punjabi mercantile communities or Rajputs? Aakar Patel 

Caste and conservatism in our TV serials


A scene from ‘Ek Hasina Thi’ on Star Plus. The 9pm serial on Star Plus, India’s biggest entertainment channel, is Diya Aur Baati Hum. It is, according to the channel’s website, “the story of Sandhya’s struggles, who dreams of becoming an IPS officer. She dreams to break the boundaries of her confined existence of middle class values. The story is also about Sooraj, who is a self made man. Sooraj runs a famous sweet shop near his house”. The two main families in the serial are the Rathis and the Kotharis. Rathis are Maheshwari Banias (same community as the Birlas). Kotharis are also Banias from the Maheshwari community. The Star Plus serial at 9.30pm is Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai, which has been running for over five years. The channel says “this is a beautiful and heart warming story of a girl called Akshara who, not unlike millions of other girls in India, knows that her marriage will happen with the consent of her parents and family. Like other young girls, she also has grown up fancying film stars and cricket starts… but to fall in love before marriage remains a distant dream for her”. The two main families are the Maheshwaris and Singhanias, both Bania surnames. The show at 10pm is Pyar Ka Dard Hai Meetha Meetha Pyara Pyara. Its story revolves around the Guptas and the Kumars. Kumar doesn’t point to any particular caste. Guptas are Banias. A still from ‘Ek Veer Ki Ardaas—Veera’ on Star Plus At 10:30pm, the channel shows Ek Veer Ki Ardaas—Veera. The two main families are both Singhs, a generic north Indian surname with claims to martial ancestry. At 11pm is Yeh Hai Mohabbatein. It features families called Bhalla, Arora and Khurana, which are Punjabi trading communities from the Arora and Khatri communities. 11.30pm has Ek Hasina Thi. The main family here is the Goenkas, a Bania surname under the Agarwal community. Zee TV’s 8.30pm daily is Do Dil Bandhe Ek Dori Se. The channel says the protagonist “Shivani Rana was born and raised in Jaipur. She belongs to a super-rich Rajasthani family on the fringes of royalty”. Rana is the title given to the leader of the Sisodiya Rajputs of Mewar (Rana Pratap). At 9pm, Zee shows Kumkum Bhagya, starring the families Arora, Mehra and Khanna. These are all three Punjabi mercantile communities which are either Khatri or Arora. At 9.30pm is Qubool Hai, a show with Muslim protagonists from the Khan and Qureshi families. Both names are generic and don’t really show caste. Quraish is the tribe of Muhammad, but is also the most common surname of north Indians from the Kasai (butcher) community. At 10pm Aur Pyaar Ho Gaya has the Khandelwal family, who are Banias. Doli Armaanon Ki at 10.30pm is set in the Rathore family. Rathores are the dominant Rajput community from Marwar. The show at 10.45pm is Ek Mutthi Aasmaan. The main families are the Singhanias (Banias) and Jadhav, which is a generic Maharashtrian name, but most often used by Marathas. At 11.15pm Pavitra Rishta has the Kirloskar (Brahmin) and Deshmukh (Maratha) families. Colors is the third largest channel. Its show at 8.30pm, Madhubala—Ek Ishq Ek Junoon, has the Sharma (Brahmin) family with a protagonist who is a Kundra. I’m not sure what Kundras are and the name doesn’t appear in my volumes of People Of India, published by the Anthropological Survey of India. At 9pm is Beintehaa, a serial whose protagonists are Muslims from the Abdullah family. At 9.30pm, Rangrasiya has the Mehras (Punjabi Khatri) and Ranawat (Rajput) families. The show at 10pm is Meri Aashiqui Tum Se Hi. It has the Parekh (Gujarati Bania) with a protagonist who is a Gujarati Rajput (Vaghela). Uttaran at 10.30pm has the Chatterjee (Brahmin) family and also some martial characters of Rajput origin (Rathore, Bundela). The new show at 11pm is Shastri Sisters, whose main families are Brahmin (Shastri and Pandey) with some characters (Sareen) who are Khatri. Life OK’s show at 8.30pm is Ek Boond Ishq about the Shekhawats, a family of Rajputs from Shekhawati. Tumhari Paakhi at 9.30pm has the Rathores (Rajput). At 8pm Sony Entertainment Television airs a show called Adaalat whose protagonist, a lawyer, is Pathak (Brahmin). At 8.30pm is Ekk Nayi Pehchaan starring the Modi (Bania) family. This show is ending and is being replaced by Itti Si Khushi starting 29 September, whose protagonist is a Goel (Bania). 9:30pm has Hum Hain Na, about the Mishra and Mukhopadhyay (both Brahmin) families. The new show at 10.30pm is Humsafars about a Muslim couple called Pathania and Chaudhry. Both this show and the other Muslim show, Qubool Hai on Zee, are produced by the same people, 4 Lions Films. The question is—why do most of the serials feature these basic types? They are either Banias, Punjabi mercantile communities or Rajputs. All together, these will not make up more than 2% of India’s population. Are we a nation that sees some castes as more attractive than others? The answer is of course yes. Even the lower castes will admit this through practice and it’s a subject for serious academic study. Sociologist M.N. Srinivas (whose house is down the lane from mine) called this Sankritization—the process by which a lower caste adopted the practices of a caste above it. The question then produced is: Do we see other castes as being off-putting? And I would say yes to that also. Growing up in Surat, I learned words of abuse (Dubla, Dhed, Bhangi) that I discovered much later were names of scavenging and other lower castes. Dubla was used for someone who was dirty (“Dubla jevo che”). Volume 22, Part 2 of the People Of India series quotes R.E. Enthoven, who put together The Tribes And Castes Of Bombay as saying: “The Dublas or weaklings, as their name is said to mean, are a feeble people, soon aged by their hard life and their fondness for liquor”. The volume says Dublas “are non-vegetarian, consuming mutton, fish, chicken and eggs”. The Dhed, the same volume says, are “non-vegetarians: eating mutton, beef, fish, eggs etc.” who “consume alcohol especially at the time of Narasingh Devta Puja. They are in the habit of smoking for the last 10 years”. These things, drinking and eating meat, inexorably stigmatized them for Gujaratis, but I didn’t see it that way as a child. There is no conceivable way that people in Gujarat would like to see a serial about a Dubla family. The truth is, we accept that the attributes that the serials’ characters aspire to—sobriety, nobility, traditionalism and conservatism—come to the Indian from birth and family not individual achievement. We casually use the phrase achche ghar ka (from a good family) to show this.

Read more at: http://www.livemint.com/Leisure/vU13TmugE9ooXyFA2RjhXI/Caste-and-conservatism-in-our-TV-serials.html?utm_source=copy





आपकी स्कर्ट से कैंसर का संबंध


  • 26 सितंबर 2014
स्कर्ट साइज़
नए शोध से पता चला है कि महिलाओं के स्कर्ट साइज़ का बढ़ना कैंसर के ख़तरे की निशानी हो सकता है.
यूनिवर्सिटी कॉलेज लंदन के शोधकर्ताओं का कहना है कि 25-26 साल की उम्र के बाद जिन महिलाएं का स्कर्ट साइज़ हर दशक के दौरान बढ़ता है उनमें स्तन कैंसर का ख़तरा अधिक होता है.
शोधकर्ताओं का कहना था, "बीस-तीस की उम्र के बाद से अपने स्कर्ट साइज़ का ध्यान रखकर बढ़ते वज़न पर नज़र रखी जा सकती है."
स्कर्ट
बढ़ते वजन पर नज़र रखकर स्तन कैंसर के ख़तरे को टाला जा सकता है.
मोटापे के कारण कैंसर का ख़तरा बढ़ जाता है.
महिला कैंसर विभाग से जुड़ीं शोधकर्ता डॉक्टर उषा मेनन ने बीबीसी से कहा, "यदि स्कर्ट साइज़ को अन्य शोधकर्ता भी ब्रेस्ट कैंसर के ख़तरे का संकेतक साबित कर देते हैं तो यह बढ़ते वज़न पर नज़र रखने का बेहद सरल तरीक़ा होगा."

90 हज़ार महिलाओं पर अध्ययन

इस शोध में 50-70 साल के बीच की इंग्लैंड में रह रहीं 90 हज़ार महिलाओं पर अध्ययन किया गया.
तीन साल के अंतराल के भीतर इनमें से 1090 महिलाएं स्तन कैंसर से पीड़ित हुईं.
शोधकर्ताओं ने पाया कि हर दशक के भीतर स्कर्ट साइज़ में एक यूनिट की बढ़ोत्तरी वाली महिलाओं में स्तन कैंसर का ख़तरा 33 फ़ीसदी तक ज़्यादा था.
रिपोर्ट के मुताबिक़ दो यूनिट साइज़ बढ़ोत्तरी वाली महिलाओं में यह ख़तरा 77 फ़ीसदी तक ज़्यादा था.
स्कर्ट
इस शोध पर टिप्पणी करते हुए ब्रेकथ्रू ब्रेस्ट कैंसर से जुड़ी साइम विंसेट ने कहा, "हम जानते हैं कि ब्रेस्ट कैंसर से जुड़े 40 प्रतिशत मामलों को फिट रहकर और वज़न नियंत्रित रखकर टाला जा सकता है."
उन्होंने कहा, "ये शोध बढ़ते वज़न पर नज़र रखने के एक सरल तरीक़े को रेखांकित करता है. महिलाएं अपने बॉडी मॉस इंडेक्स के बजाए स्कर्ट साइज़ को ज़्यादा आसानी से याद रख सकती हैं."
(बीबीसी हिंदी का एंड्रॉयड मोबाइल ऐप डाउनलोड करने के लिए यहां क्लिक करें. आप 
हमसे फ़ेसबुक और ट्विटर पर भी जुड़ सकते हैं.)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/hindi/science/2014/09/140925_skirt_size_cancer_risk_dil.shtml?ocid=socialflow_facebook

‘Tribal has to fight since he has been locked up for so long’ 21 September 2014, Dantewada, Parakram Rautela

It is almost one in the afternoon by the time she walks into the Dantewada district and sessions court – the court starts at 11 – where she is fighting the last of the seven cases that have so far been slapped against her.
Soni Sori starts her day by reporting to the nearest police station. Which is why it is almost one in the afternoon by the time she walks into the Dantewada district and sessions court – the court starts at 11 – where she is fighting the last of the seven cases that have so far been slapped against her.

She is, this time, accused of being on the verge of accepting a payoff by the Indian MNC Essar and ferrying it to the Maoists. (Soni has been acquitted in all of the other six cases.)

Before she became a member of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), Sori has been a government school teacher-turned-tribal activist. She fought the 2014 Lok Sabha elections from Bastar, but lost. Somewhat more cynically, Soni is sometimes referred to as a ‘cause célèbre in liberal drawing rooms.’ While that might technically be true, it is also just as true that according to a report (by NRS Medical Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata) submitted to the Supreme Court, stones were inserted into Sori’s vagina and rectum while she was in police custody. And that – this is not part of the report – her husband suffered a stroke under mysterious circumstances while in jail, which reportedly led to his death.

But those are the perils of living in a conflict zone, and Sori’s life is in many ways emblematic of those dangers.

“Bahut danger hai,” she says when you ask her if it is dangerous to live in a conflict zone, where you’re stuck between the police on the one side and the Naxals on the other. ‘You have to listen to both sides – they’re both armed. In a conflict zone, the power of the police tends to get amplified.’ And that you’re never quite certain which side will fire the next salvo. Soni says for example that when her nephew Lingaram Kodopi was ‘picked up.’ She kept asking the men taking him away whether they were police or Naxals. But no answer was forthcoming.

Soni says that even turning into a “cause célèbre” did not necessarily make her life easier. Threats and intimidation continued. And that what finally did make a difference was the AAP nomination. That it was only the threat of her turning into a member of parliament that finally made local officialdom back off.

Soni recounts a conversation she had with a senior police official on her return to Chhattisgarh earlier this year after the Supreme Court gave her bail. The cop said to her: “You will say there is no need for outsiders to come into Chhattisgarh. We can solve our own problems. You will denounce these outsiders.” Soni’s answer was a ‘no’. That if she had got any help, fighting the charges against her and getting bail, it was because of outsiders.  The cop said: “Outsiders will not come to your house. You will not meet with them there.”  Soni’s answer again was no. That whosoever wished to come to her home was welcome to. That she is now a member of the Aam Aadmi Party, and the police cannot tell her who she can and cannot meet.  How did the cop react? “He kept quiet,” says Soni. 

Even today, most policemen tend not to want to talk about Soni Sori. “She is not a benchmark, and an acquittal does not mean a crime was not committed,” said a senior police official, without wishing to be named.

According to Shalini Gera, Soni’s lawyer, Soni is the way she is because “she has a strong sense of justice. And that she doesn’t easily back down.”  Other battles lie ahead. Soni speaks of the other tribals she met while in jail, people who had spent as many as six years in jail as undertrials without getting bail – a distressingly familiar trope that you hear again and again in Chhattisgarh. “It is always the tribals who are stuck in jail, mostly on Naxal-related charges and you don’t get bail in those cases,” says Soni.

She adds that it is a difficult battle to fight. “Today, I will tell a tribal to fight the state because he has been locked up for so long, and he might agree. But tomorrow, the police will tell him to drop the case, and he will agree to that too. The tribal is usually a simple man, worried about jal, jungle, jameen, not rules and regulations.”

But Soni believes that an opportunity has presented itself with the recent arrest of Virendra Pratap Singh, a government school teacher like herself, who has been arrested for allegedly aiding the Maoists and is currently being held in Dantewada jail. “He’s a teacher like me. He’s not a tribal. He should want to fight. And it will be a good way to get word about the problem out.”

Soni says she went to the jail to meet him but that she was not allowed to because she was not family. And that she has been able to speak to his family over the phone but – she claims – that they’re scared, that they’re being pressurised to stay away from her. “I can understand,” says Soni. “They did the same thing with me.” http://www.millenniumpost.in/NewsContent.aspx?NID=69797


Just listen to what women are saying Did Emma Watson’s





UN speech say anything that has not been said before? Does Deepika Padukone ask for something out of the ordinary when she asks for basic respect? Yet these words have not been heard enough
Just listen to what women are saying
UN women’s goodwill ambassador Emma Watson. Photo: Andres Stapff/Reuters Last weekend, our middle child was sitting angrily with her Hindi homework. She had to write an essay on what she wants to be when she grows up. “That’s an easy one,” I said to her. “What do you want to be?” “I don’t know, Mamma,” she said. “That’s fine,” I said. “You can write that you are interested in a lot of things but have not made up your mind.” “I want to be a criminal,” she said with much emphasis. “Like Robin Hood?” I asked, hopefully. “No,” she said. “I want to be a real criminal. I will kill people.” I suspect that if Aliza had been a nine-year-old son, I might have plummeted into a parental crisis immediately. But Aliza is a very quiet and gentle child and the novelty of her expression amused me. “I want to be a criminal because the good people are all bad people and the bad people are good people,” she elaborated. I think I know what she means. She is trying to make sense of the same world that we have become exhausted from outraging against. We switch on the radio in the car and we switch it off in disgust. Sometimes it is the RJ offering us entertainment by calling up unsuspecting people and humiliating them on air. Sometimes it is just the lyrics of a new song where a man says to a woman that “he’s the son of a Jat and he just doesn’t take no for an answer.” Before I began to write this column for Mint Lounge, I had submitted some ideas for future columns to the editor. Point No.4 reads like this: “It is safer to let one’s daughters play with Barbie dolls than it is to subscribe to The Times Of India (TOI). One day I want to offer myself for public slaughter by making this argument. One day, not today.” I never did steer in this direction and then came the events of the last two weeks where we had the TOI, India’s largest English newspaper stooping really low in response to being confronted by one of India’s most popular Hindi film actors, Deepika Padukone. Padukone called out the newspaper’s “regressive tactics” and wrote, “…digging out an old article and headlining it ‘OMG: Deepika’s Cleavage Show!’ to attract readers is using the power of influence to proliferate recessive thought.” The TOI responded by drawing a red circle around her cleavage in another photograph of Padukone and splashing more pictures of her in a collage in its supplement, Bombay Times. Headlines sought to diminish her argument by calling Padukone a hypocrite for insisting that she has a right to choose how she wants to be represented. At about the same time, another actor, Emma Watson, delivered a speech on feminism and gender at the United Nations headquarters. “I think it is right that I should be able to make decisions about my own body. I think it is right that women be involved on my behalf in the policies and the decisions that will affect my life. I think it is right that socially, I am afforded the same respect as men.” My husband and I used to worry about the world in which our children are growing up in our own separate, isolated ways for years. These days we seem to have found a way to talk about our conflicts and fears without our conversation necessarily deteriorating into a confused, emotional argument between ourselves. Together, we watched the video of Watson delivering her speech at the UN. She walks up to the podium and takes her place with poise before she begins to address a room full of distinguished and accomplished people. Our youngest child, Naseem, is six years old and often takes a day off from school to catch up with her personal life. “Looks like Hermione to me,” she said. “It is her,” I said. “These rights, I consider to be human rights…my parents didn’t love me less because I was born a daughter. My school did not limit me because I was a girl. My mentors didn’t assume that I would go less far because I might give birth to a child one day,” says Watson in her speech that has now gone viral on the Internet. One part of me is watching to see if she will refer to her written notes even once. She doesn’t. I am reminded of the earnestness I see on the faces of young adults speaking at their events. “I’ve seen young men suffering from mental illness, unable to ask for help, for fear it would make them less of a men—or less of a man. In fact, in the UK, suicide is the biggest killer of men, between 20-49, eclipsing road accidents, cancer and coronary heart disease…Men don’t have the benefits of equality, either.” Did Watson say anything that has not been said before? Does Padukone ask for something out of the ordinary when she asks for basic respect? Yet these words have not been heard enough. They haven’t been validated enough. “You might be thinking, Who is this Harry Potter girl,” Watson laughs at the end of her speech. “What is she doing speaking at the UN?” “It is Hermione!” said Naseem excitedly. “She said Harry Potter! I have to tell Sahar and Aliza when they return home that you two were watching Hermione alone,” she declared. Naseem’s sisters came home and listened to the speech too. Watson was using very big words so Sahar switched on the subtitles. “What do you like about Hermione,” I asked them later. “She always thinks things through. She makes plans and is very organized,” says Sahar. “Hmm,” I say. “She is very hard working but she has her own sense of fun,” adds Aliza. “Plus she is very, very wise.” Natasha Badhwar is a media trainer, entrepreneur and mother of three. She writes a fortnightly column on family and relationships.

Read more at: http://www.livemint.com/Leisure/vQjR6fx2j7WIXLshwkHqBN/Just-listen-to-what-women-are-saying.html?utm_source=copy

Thursday, 25 September 2014

Vrindavan widows angry with Hema Malini, to talk to Mamata

 — By PTI,  September 23, 2014 04:39 pm
HEMA MALINIVrindavan: Worried about their future in the holy town of Vrindavan after local MP Hema Malini’s “outsider” remarks, a group of widows today left for their home state West Bengal where they want to disc ss the matter with Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee.
“What Hema Malini has said is scary. Does she want to remove us from here? Where will we go?” 65-old-year Aarti Nath told PTI.
She had left her Howrah home four years ago after her son started misbehaving following her husband’s death. Vrindavan, where thousands of widows live and worship Lord Krishna, was her only refuge.
Along with 50 others, she left for Kolkata today from Vrindavan to celebrate Durga Puja. They have sought an appointment with the CM and Governor K N Tripathi to discuss the matter with them during their stay.
“We will talk to her on this if the government can help us. Not all of us go and beg in temples. We have been given a bad name,” another widow who stays in an ashram sponsored by NGO Sulabh said.
The former screen goddess and now a BJP MP Hema Malini had recently stoked controversy with her remarks that widows from West Bengal and Bihar should not crowd Vrindavan.
She had said that responsibility of looking after widows should be of states from where they hail.
West Bengal’s Minister of Women and Child Welfare Shashi Panja told PTI that she would meet the widows during their Kolkata visit.
“First we need to understand what these widows want from us. After that we will decide what help can be given from the state government side,” she said.
NGO Sulabh is looking after 1,000 Vrindavan widows as part of a Supreme Court directive to remove the stigma attached to their lives.
Forced into a life of isolation, dejection and poverty, these widows were living under pathetic conditions without any proper food, medical and hygienic facilities.
Sulabh has now started providing pension, food, health and other facilities to these women, besides giving them vocational training and employment.http://freepressjournal.in/vrindavan-widows-angry-with-hema-malini-to-talk-to-mamata/

Indian Films High on Sexualisation of Women: UN Report
India tops the chart in showing attractive women in its movies and as much as 35 per cent of these female characters are shown with some nudity, finds a first-ever UN sponsored global study of female characters in popular films across the world.

The study, commissioned by the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media, with support from UN Women and The Rockefeller Foundation, reveals deep-seated discrimination, pervasive stereotyping, sexualisation of women and their underrepresentation in powerful roles by the international film industry.

Indian films, the study finds, have a significantly higher prevalence of sexualisation of female characters and the movies score low in depicting women in significant speaking roles and as engineers and scientists.

While women represent nearly half of the world's population, less than one third of all speaking characters in films are female and UK-US collaborations and Indian films are at the bottom of the pack.

Both, the American/British hybrid films (23.6 per cent) and Indian films (24.9 per cent) show female characters in less than one-quarter of all speaking roles. Even the frontrunners (UK, Brazil and South Korea) feature female characters in 35.9-38 per cent of all speaking roles on screen.

Sexualisation of female characters in movies is a standard practice across the global film industry and women are twice as likely as men to be shown in sexually revealing clothing, partially or fully naked, thin, and five times as likely to be referenced as attractive.

Indian films are third behind German and Australian movies in showing females in "sexy attire" and at 25.2 per cent India tops the chart in showing attractive females in its movies.

About 35 per cent of female characters in Indian movies are shown with some nudity, the study finds. The prevalence of female directors, writers and producers in the Indian films was also not at a very high number.

India had 9.1 per cent female directors, slightly above the global average of 7 per cent, while its percentage of female writers was 12.1 per cent, significantly lower than the 19.7 per cent global average.

Female producers in India were only 15.2 per cent, way below the 22.7 per cent global average. This data of gender prevalence behind the camera translated into a gender ratio of 6.2 males to every one female in the film industry in India.

The study also noted that when shown in professional roles, females are largely absent from powerful positions. Women represent less than 15 per cent of business executives, political figures, or science, technology, engineering, and/or math (STEM) employees.

In India, out of a sample size of 12 jobs onscreen in the scientific and engineering field, 91.7 per cent were portrayed by males while only 8.3 per cent were females.

"Viewers would be hard pressed to find mediated examples of female executives on par with US's (India-born PepsiCo Chief) Indra Nooyi, India's (ICICI bank chief) Chanda Kochhar, or Australia's (businesswoman) Gail Kelly in our sample of films," the report added.

In the field of politics, only 12 women were shown at the highest levels of local, state/provincial, or national governmental authority, as against 115 males, a gender ratio of 9.6 to one.

Academy-award winning actor Davis, who is the founder and chair of the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media said that media images can also have a positive impact on people's perceptions.

"In the time it takes to make a movie, we can change what the future looks like. There are woefully few women CEOs in the world, but there can be lots of them in films.

"How do we encourage a lot more girls to pursue science, technology and engineering careers? By casting droves of women in STEM, politics, law and other professions today in movies," she added.

Conceiving of female CEOs, politicians, lawyers, judges, and doctors, the study says, is the work of a creative writing moment but could have important and lasting consequences for the next generation.

It added that when films featured a female director or writer, the number of female characters on screen increased significantly.

One remedy to correct gender disparity on screen is to hire more female filmmakers and call on film executives to have a heightened sensitivity to gender imbalance and stereotyping on screen. Other key findings of the study include that females are missing in action/adventure films.

The study analysed popular films released between January 2010 and May 2013 across the global film industries, including Australia, Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, Russia, South Korea, US, UK, as well as UK-US collaborations.
http://www.outlookindia.com/news/article/Indian-Films-High-on-Sexualisation-of-Women-UN-Report/861077#.VCKW6WQ926o.facebook